首页> 外文OA文献 >Frame of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (Hti) as a Fundamentalis Group in the Discourse of Democracy in Online Media
【2h】

Frame of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (Hti) as a Fundamentalis Group in the Discourse of Democracy in Online Media

机译:Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia(Hti)作为在线媒体中民主话题的基础团体的框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Indonesia is a democratic country. Therefore, Indonesia conducts periodic general election every five years since 1955. Indonesia has variety/difersity of culture . That one gives different attitude toward democracy both as a system or as an ideology. One of the attitude is the expression of a rejection against democracy. One of organizations/groups rejecting democracy is Hizb Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). It articulates its rejection to democracy through online media (website). This research tries to find frames on HTI\u27s websites regarding discourse of democracy. Method of this study is qualitative-content analysis, using agenda setting theory at the second level (level frame). In looking for news, this research used key words: “pemilihan umum/general election”, “demokrasi/democracy”. The result finds four (4) main frames in its websites: (1) the frame of democracy as a tool of capitalism and colonialism; (2) Frame of Indonesian government as an colonialist\u27s cat\u27s paw; (3) frame of democracy as a shield of non-Muslims; (4). frame of democracy as a system that make people in misery. In this study, researcher doesn\u27t dealt with interesting topics because of the limitations of the method/tool used. Therefore, for further studies, it needs to deepen this issue. Coverage of research should not be limited to only HTI but other muslim organizations.
机译:印度尼西亚是一个民主国家。因此,印尼自1955年起每五年举行一次定期大选。印尼的文化千差万别。无论是制度上还是意识形态上,人们对民主的态度都不同。一种态度是拒绝民主。拒绝民主的组织/团体之一是印尼真主党。它通过在线媒体(网站)表达了其对民主的拒绝。这项研究试图在HTI网站上找到有关民主话语的框架。本研究的方法是定性内容分析,使用议程设置理论的第二级(级别框架)。在寻找新闻时,这项研究使用了关键词:“民盟/大选”,“民主/民主”。结果在其网站上找到了四(4)个主要框架:(1)民主作为资本主义和殖民主义的工具; (2)印尼政府为殖民主义者的爪子; (3)民主框架作为非穆斯林的盾牌; (4)。民主框架是使人们陷入苦难的系统。在本研究中,由于所用方法/工具的局限性,研究人员未处理有趣的主题。因此,有待进一步研究,有必要深化这个问题。研究范围不仅限于HTI,还应包括其他穆斯林组织。

著录项

  • 作者

    Karman, nfn;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ID
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号